Stimuli in the adaptation process to digital transformation among university faculty members: internal and external drivers of technological change
https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-3999-2026-1-3-75-85
Abstract
This study examined internal and external stimuli influencing faculty adaptation to digital transformation in higher education settings. The study applies cross-sectional survey of 154 faculty members from Kazakhstani universities used validated instruments. Results revealed a clear stimulus hierarchy: internal stimuli (intrinsic motivation, selfefficacy) explained 21% of unique variance in technology acceptance, compared to 4% for organizational support and less than 1% for external negative stimuli. Age significantly moderated these relationships. Internal stimuli were stronger predictors for younger faculty (β = 0.42 vs. 0.18), while organizational support was more critical for older faculty (β = 0.34 vs. 0.08). External pressure showed harmful effects only among senior faculty members (β = −0.31). The cluster analysis that identified four faculty typologies characterized by distinct stimulus-response profiles. These findings suggest that successful digital transformation requires age-differentiated, autonomy-supportive institutional approaches rather than uniform mandates. The study findings can help to promote digital transformation across higher education institutions more effectively.
About the Authors
A. M. TurgumbayevaKazakhstan
PhD, associate research professor
Almaty
A. A. Kassymzhanova
Kazakhstan
с.ps.s., research professor
Almaty
G. K. Slanbekova
Kazakhstan
PhD, associate professor
Karaganda
References
1. Seiıtqazy P.B. (2019) Joğary oqu orny studentterın käsıbi ıs-äreketke daiarlaudyñ pedagogikalyq şarttary / P.B. Seiıtqazy, P.S. Rahimgalieva // Bılım beru praktikasy sapasyn joğarylatudyñ özektı mäselelerı. Qostanai. Р. 193–197. (In Kazakh)
2. Molchanova O.N. (2020) Psihologija samoocenki: uchebnoe posobie dlja vuzov / O.N. Molchanova. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Jurajt. 308 р. (In Russian)
3. Habarova A.S. (2018) Faktory, formirujushhie social’no-psihologicheskij klimat organizacii / A.S. Habarova // Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. No. 2(2). P. 90–92. (In Russian)
4. Zagoskina I.V. (2016) Komfortnaja obrazovatel’naja sreda vuza v formirovanii intellektual’noj kul’tury studentov / I.V. Zagoskina // Sovremennye nauchnye issledovanija i innovacii. No. 1. URL: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2016/01/62046 (data obrashhenija: 10.09.2026) (In Russian)
5. Balyқbaev T.O. (2018) Nacional’naja sistema ocenki kachestva obrazovanija Respubliki Kazahstan: principy i perspektivy razvitija / T.O. Balyқbaev. Almaty. (In Russian)
6. Taubaeva Sh.T., Muratbaeva G.A., Konyrbaeva S.S. (2023) Teoreticheskie osnovy pedagogicheskih izmerenij: uchebnoe posobie. Almaty: Daryn, 2023. 285 р. (In Russian)
7. Primbetova G.S., Kunakova K.O. (2020) K probleme izmerenija professional’nyh kompetencij prepodavatelej vysshej shkoly // Vestnik Akademii pedagogicheskih nauk Kazahstana. No. 1. Р. 41–48. (In Russian)
8. Jugova M.A., Jugova E.A. (2023) Psihojemocional’nyj komfort kak jelement zdorov’esberegajushhej obrazovatel’noj sredy // Sovremennye naukoemkie tehnologii. No. 7. Р. 227–231. URL: https://top-technologies.ru/ru/article/view?id=39721 (data obrashhenija: 10.09.2026) (In Russian)
9. Shahdani S.A., Koleoshkina S.V. (2025) Komfortnyj psihologicheskij klimat v obrazovatel’noj srede – kljuch k uspeshnoj socializacii studentov v rossijskih vuzah // Molodoj uchenyj. No. 4 (555). Р. 471–475. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/555/122064 (data obrashhenija: 10.09.2026) (In Russian)
10. Rahimgalieva P.S. (2020) Studentterdің zhoғarғy oқu ornyna bejіmdeluіn psihologijalyқ қoldau // «Bіlіm beru sapasyn zhetіldіrudegі pedagogikalyқ zhoғary oқu orny men mekteptі integracijalaudyң mәselelerі men zhaңa baғdarlary» atty Altynsarin oқulary halyқaralyқ ғylymi-praktikalyқ konferencijasynyң materialdary. Қostanaj, Р. 491–494. (In Russian)
11. Glendos M. (2017) Students’ dreams for the future and perspectives on resiliencebuilding aspects of their lives: The view from East Greenland // Children and Youth Services Review. No. 79. P. 348–354. (In English)
12. Todd K.B. (2010) Psychological Flexibility as a Fundamental Aspect of Health / K.B. Todd, J. Rottenberg // Clinical Psychology Review. Vol. 30. No. 7. P. 865–878. (In English)
13. Fomina T.G. (2024) Stress v obrazovatel’noj srede i ego vlijanie na akademicheskuju uspeshnost’ i psihologicheskoe blagopoluchie obuchajushhihsja // Nacional’nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal. Moskva. Vol. 19. No. 4. Р. 148–160. (In Russian)
14. Dunaeva N.I. (2023) Formirovanie soprotivljaemosti lichnosti studentov v uslovijah sovremennoj obrazovatel’noj sredy // Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta. Vol. 11. No. 1(42). DOI: 10.26795/2307-1281-2023-11-1-10 (In Russian)
15. Tapalova O.B. (2013) Psihofiziologicheskie pokazateli polozhitel’noj motivacii lichnosti budushhego specialista // Vysshaja shkola Kazahstana. Almaty. No. Р. 218–222. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Turgumbayeva A.M., Kassymzhanova A.A., Slanbekova G.K. Stimuli in the adaptation process to digital transformation among university faculty members: internal and external drivers of technological change. Eurasian Journal of Current Research in Psychology and Pedagogy. 2026;(3):75-85. https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-3999-2026-1-3-75-85
JATS XML
