Methodological system for using digital literary texts in the teaching process

The article was prepared within the framework of a grant from Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University. It provides a comprehensive study of the scientific and methodological foundations of using digital literary texts in the educational process. The purpose of the study is to provide pedagogical justification for literary texts in digital formats (e-books, hypertext works, multimodal texts, interactive reading platforms), to identify their differences from traditional printed texts, and to propose an effective teaching methodology. As a result of the study, a pedagogical classification of digital text types was developed; the process of cognitive dissonance emergence between the reader’s traditional text perception schema and the new experience of digital formats was revealed; and a five-stage scientific and methodological model was proposed (activation of digital context, text analysis, interpretation, critical evaluation, and creative production). International and domestic empirical data confirm the effectiveness of the proposed model: systematic work with digital texts has been shown to improve students’ reading comprehension levels. The article is intended for secondary school teachers as well as researchers in the fields of pedagogy and teaching methodology.

1. «Sifrlyq Qazaqstan» memlekettık bağdarlamasy: Qazaqstan Respublikasy Ükımetınıñ 2017 jylğy 12 jeltoqsandağy № 827 qaulysy. (In Kazakh)

2. Bolter J.D. (2001) Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 244 p. (In English)

3. Wolf M. (2018) Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World. New York: Harper. 256 p. (In English)

4. Mangen A., Walgermo B.R. (2013) Reading Linear Texts on Paper versus Computer Screen: Effects on Reading Comprehension // International Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 58. P. 61–68. (In English)

5. PISA 2022 Results. Creative Minds, Connected Lives. Vol. II. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/cc2b8a14-en (accessed: 17.06.2026) (In English)

6. Kress G. (2010) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge. 212 p. (In English)

7. Hobbs R. (2011) Digital and Media Literacy: Connecting Culture and Classroom. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press. 198 p. (In English)

8. Landow G.P. (2006) Hypertext 3.0: Critical Theory and New Media in an Era of Globalization. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 436 p.

9. Mayer R.E. (2009) Multimedia Learning. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 320 p. (In English)

10. «Qazaq tılı», «Qazaq ädebietı» oqu pänderı boiynşa oqytu prosesınde sifrlyq kontenttı paidalanu jönındegı ädıstemelık ūsynymdar. Nūr-Sūltan: Y. Altynsarin atyndağy ŪBA, 2022. 320 р. (In Kazakh)

11. Abdrahmanova A.Zh., Alipkalieva G.B. Cifrovizacija obrazovanija. URL: http://www.zkoipk.kz/ru/smartconf2019/2-section/5075-conf.html (data obrashhenija: 17.06.2026) (In Russian)

12. Buzaubakova K.D., Bedelbaeva A.E. (2024) Sifrly bılım beru ortasyndağy pedagogtıñ qyzmetı: oqulyq. Taraz: İP «Beisenbekova Ä.J.». 129 р.

13. Boranşy S., Dulat M.T. Jahandanu däuırınde qazaq ädebietın oqytu: sifrlyq tehnologialar. URL: https://ust.kz/word/jaxandany_dayirinde_qazaq_adebietin_oqyty_cifrlyq_tehnologiyalar-349745.html (ötınış berılgen kün: 17.04.2026) (In Kazakh)

14. Sarsenbaeva N.F., Myrzahmetova B.Sh., Adylbekova Je.T. (2021) Cifrovizacija obrazovanija v Respublike Kazahstan // Mir pedagogiki i psihologii. No. 1 (54). Р. 45–51. (In Russian)

15. Gee J.P. (2003) What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 256 p. (In English)

16. Buckingham D. (2019) The Media Education Manifesto. Cambridge: Polity Press. 168 p. (In English)

17. Topping K.J. (2020) Peers as a Resource for Learning: A Review of Evidence on Peer Assessment and Feedback // Educational Psychology Review. Vol. 32. No. 4. P. 1225–1243. (In English)

18. Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D.R. (Eds.). (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Educational Objectives. New York: Longman. (In English)

19. Fisher D., Frey N. (2014) Checking for Understanding: Formative Assessment Techniques for Your Classroom. 2nd ed. Alexandria: ASCD. 208 p. (In English)

20. Abrams S., Williams D. (2021) Social Annotation and Collaborative Reading: Effects on Literary Argumentation in Secondary Classrooms // Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. Vol. 64. No. 6. P. 663–672. (In English)

21. Graham S., Perin D. (2007) Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. 66 p. (In English)