Digital neuropsychology: transforming cognitive assessment and rehabilitation in the digital age

Digital neuropsychology is an emerging interdisciplinary field integrating traditional neuropsychological principles with digital technologies to enhance cognitive assessment, diagnosis, and rehabilitation. This article examines the evolution of digital tools in neuropsychological practice, evaluating their validity, reliability, and clinical utility compared to traditional paper-and-pencil methods. We analyze current applications including computerized cognitive testing, virtual reality-based assessments, mobile health applications, and artificial intelligence-driven diagnostic systems. Digital technology integration offers unprecedented opportunities for continuous monitoring, personalized interventions, and improved accessibility to neuropsychological services. However, significant challenges persist regarding standardization, data security, and culturally adapted digital instruments. The systematic review examined extensive international research, revealing substantial growth in digital neuropsychology applications across diverse clinical populations. Well-validated computerized batteries demonstrate psychometric properties comparable to traditional methods while offering significant advantages in precision, efficiency, and ecological validity. This comprehensive review synthesizes recent developments in digital neuropsychology and provides evidence-based recommendations for future research and clinical implementation.

1. Parsons T.D. Virtual Reality for Enhanced Ecological Validity and Experimental Control in the Clinical, Affective and Social Neurosciences // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015. Vol. 9. P. 660–678.

2. Zygouris S. Computerized Cognitive Testing for Older Adults: A Review // American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias. 2015. Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 13–28.

3. Chan J.Y.C. Teleneuropsychology in China: Current Status and Future Directions // Neuropsychology Review. 2021. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 363–378.

4. Bauer R.M. The Future of Neuropsychological Assessment in the Digital Age // Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2020. Vol. 35. No. 1. P. 1–17.

5. Kourtesis P. Validation of the Virtual Reality Neuroscience Questionnaire: Maximum Duration of Immersive Virtual Reality Sessions Without the Presence of Pertinent Adverse Symptomatology // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2019. Vol. 13. P. 417–431.

6. Lampit A. Computerized Cognitive Training in Cognitively Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effect Modifiers // PLoS Medicine. 2014. Vol. 11. No. 11. Article e1001756.

7. Öhman F. Current Advances in Digital Cognitive Assessment for Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease // Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring. 2021. Vol. 13. No. 1. Article e12217.

8. Torous J. Smartphones, Sensors, and Machine Learning to Advance Real-Time Prediction and Understanding of Suicide Risk // JAMA Psychiatry. 2018. Vol. 75. No. 7. P. 633–634.

9. Germine L. Is the Web as Good as the Lab? Comparable Performance from Web and Lab in Cognitive/ Perceptual Experiments // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2012. Vol. 19. No. 5. P. 847–857.

10. Mantovani E. Teleneuropsychology in Italy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Neurological Sciences. 2022. Vol. 43. No. 2. P. 847–861.

11. Lumsden J. Gamification of Cognitive Assessment and Cognitive Training: A Systematic Review of Applications and Efficacy // JMIR Serious Games. 2016. Vol. 4. No. 2. Article e11.

12. Bilder R.M. Neuropsychology 3.0: Evidence-Based Science and Practice // Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2011. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 7–13.

13. Ashendorf L. A Survey of Neuropsychologists’ Practices and Perspectives Regarding the COVID-19 Pandemic // The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2020. Vol. 34. No. 7–8. P. 1251–1268.

14. Shahrestani S. Machine Learning in the Realm of Neurosurgery Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review // Neurosurgical Review. 2020. Vol. 43. No. 2. P. 543–552.

15. Wild K. Status of Computerized Cognitive Testing in Aging: A Systematic Review // Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2008. Vol. 4. No. 6. P. 428–437.