ejcrEurasian Journal of Current Research in Psychology and PedagogyEurasian Journal of Current Research in Psychology and Pedagogy2959-39992959-4006Университет «Туран»10.46914/2959-3999-2025-1-4-22-29ejcr-278Research ArticleКлиническая и специальная психологияClinical and Special PsychologyЦифровая нейропсихология: трансформация когнитивной оценки и реабилитации в цифровую эпохуDigital neuropsychology: transforming cognitive assessment and rehabilitation in the digital agehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4908-5132СланбековаГ. К.SlanbekovaG. K.

PhD, ассоциированный профессор

г. Караганда

PhD, associate professor

Karaganda

gulnaraslanbekova1@gmail.comКарагандинский национальный исследовательский университет им. академика Е.А. БукетоваКазахстанAcademician Ye.A. Buketov Karaganda National Research UniversityKazakhstan202507022026042229Copyright © Сланбекова Г.К., 20262026Сланбекова Г.К.Slanbekova G.K.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ejcrpp.turan-edu.kz/jour/article/view/278

Цифровая нейропсихология представляет собой формирующуюся междисциплинарную область, интег­ рирующую традиционные нейропсихологические принципы с цифровыми технологиями для улучшения когнитивной оценки, диагностики и реабилитации. В данной статье рассматривается эволюция цифровых инструментов в нейропсихологической практике с оценкой их валидности, надежности и клинической полезности в сравнении с традиционными методами «карандаш-бумага». Проанализированы современные применения, включая компьютеризированное когнитивное тестирование, оценку на основе виртуальной реальности, мобильные медицинские приложения и диагностические системы на основе искусственного интеллекта. Интеграция цифровых технологий открывает беспрецедентные возможности для непрерывного мониторинга, персонализированных вмешательств и улучшения доступности нейропсихологических услуг. Однако сохраняются значительные проблемы, касающиеся стандартизации, безопасности данных и культурно адаптированных цифровых инструментов. Систематический обзор охватил обширные международные исследования, выявив существенный рост применения цифровой нейропсихологии в различных клинических популяциях. Хорошо валидизированные компьютеризированные батареи демонстрируют психометрические свойства, сопоставимые с традиционными методами, предлагая при этом значительные преимущества в точности, эффективности и экологической валидности. Данный комплексный обзор синтезирует последние достижения в цифровой нейропсихологии и предоставляет научно обоснованные рекомендации для будущих исследований и клинического внедрения.

Digital neuropsychology is an emerging interdisciplinary field integrating traditional neuropsychological principles with digital technologies to enhance cognitive assessment, diagnosis, and rehabilitation. This article examines the evolution of digital tools in neuropsychological practice, evaluating their validity, reliability, and clinical utility compared to traditional paper-and-pencil methods. We analyze current applications including computerized cognitive testing, virtual reality-based assessments, mobile health applications, and artificial intelligence-driven diagnostic systems. Digital technology integration offers unprecedented opportunities for continuous monitoring, personalized interventions, and improved accessibility to neuropsychological services. However, significant challenges persist regarding standardization, data security, and culturally adapted digital instruments. The systematic review examined extensive international research, revealing substantial growth in digital neuropsychology applications across diverse clinical populations. Well-validated computerized batteries demonstrate psychometric properties comparable to traditional methods while offering significant advantages in precision, efficiency, and ecological validity. This comprehensive review synthesizes recent developments in digital neuropsychology and provides evidence-based recommendations for future research and clinical implementation.

цифровая нейропсихологиякомпьютеризированная оценкакогнитивная реабилитациявиртуальная реальностьискусственный интеллекттеленейропсихология.digital neuropsychologycomputerized assessmentcognitive rehabilitationvirtual realityartificial intelligenceteleneuropsychology.ReferencesParsons T.D. Virtual Reality for Enhanced Ecological Validity and Experimental Control in the Clinical, Affective and Social Neurosciences // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015. Vol. 9. P. 660–678.Parsons T.D. Virtual Reality for Enhanced Ecological Validity and Experimental Control in the Clinical, Affective and Social Neurosciences // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015. Vol. 9. P. 660–678.Zygouris S. Computerized Cognitive Testing for Older Adults: A Review // American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias. 2015. Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 13–28.Zygouris S. Computerized Cognitive Testing for Older Adults: A Review // American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias. 2015. Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 13–28.Chan J.Y.C. Teleneuropsychology in China: Current Status and Future Directions // Neuropsychology Review. 2021. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 363–378.Chan J.Y.C. Teleneuropsychology in China: Current Status and Future Directions // Neuropsychology Review. 2021. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 363–378.Bauer R.M. The Future of Neuropsychological Assessment in the Digital Age // Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2020. Vol. 35. No. 1. P. 1–17.Bauer R.M. The Future of Neuropsychological Assessment in the Digital Age // Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2020. Vol. 35. No. 1. P. 1–17.Kourtesis P. Validation of the Virtual Reality Neuroscience Questionnaire: Maximum Duration of Immersive Virtual Reality Sessions Without the Presence of Pertinent Adverse Symptomatology // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2019. Vol. 13. P. 417–431.Kourtesis P. Validation of the Virtual Reality Neuroscience Questionnaire: Maximum Duration of Immersive Virtual Reality Sessions Without the Presence of Pertinent Adverse Symptomatology // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2019. Vol. 13. P. 417–431.Lampit A. Computerized Cognitive Training in Cognitively Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effect Modifiers // PLoS Medicine. 2014. Vol. 11. No. 11. Article e1001756.Lampit A. Computerized Cognitive Training in Cognitively Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effect Modifiers // PLoS Medicine. 2014. Vol. 11. No. 11. Article e1001756.Öhman F. Current Advances in Digital Cognitive Assessment for Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease // Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring. 2021. Vol. 13. No. 1. Article e12217.Öhman F. Current Advances in Digital Cognitive Assessment for Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease // Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring. 2021. Vol. 13. No. 1. Article e12217.Torous J. Smartphones, Sensors, and Machine Learning to Advance Real-Time Prediction and Understanding of Suicide Risk // JAMA Psychiatry. 2018. Vol. 75. No. 7. P. 633–634.Torous J. Smartphones, Sensors, and Machine Learning to Advance Real-Time Prediction and Understanding of Suicide Risk // JAMA Psychiatry. 2018. Vol. 75. No. 7. P. 633–634.Germine L. Is the Web as Good as the Lab? Comparable Performance from Web and Lab in Cognitive/ Perceptual Experiments // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2012. Vol. 19. No. 5. P. 847–857.Germine L. Is the Web as Good as the Lab? Comparable Performance from Web and Lab in Cognitive/ Perceptual Experiments // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2012. Vol. 19. No. 5. P. 847–857.Mantovani E. Teleneuropsychology in Italy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Neurological Sciences. 2022. Vol. 43. No. 2. P. 847–861.Mantovani E. Teleneuropsychology in Italy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Neurological Sciences. 2022. Vol. 43. No. 2. P. 847–861.Lumsden J. Gamification of Cognitive Assessment and Cognitive Training: A Systematic Review of Applications and Efficacy // JMIR Serious Games. 2016. Vol. 4. No. 2. Article e11.Lumsden J. Gamification of Cognitive Assessment and Cognitive Training: A Systematic Review of Applications and Efficacy // JMIR Serious Games. 2016. Vol. 4. No. 2. Article e11.Bilder R.M. Neuropsychology 3.0: Evidence-Based Science and Practice // Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2011. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 7–13.Bilder R.M. Neuropsychology 3.0: Evidence-Based Science and Practice // Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2011. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 7–13.Ashendorf L. A Survey of Neuropsychologists’ Practices and Perspectives Regarding the COVID-19 Pandemic // The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2020. Vol. 34. No. 7–8. P. 1251–1268.Ashendorf L. A Survey of Neuropsychologists’ Practices and Perspectives Regarding the COVID-19 Pandemic // The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2020. Vol. 34. No. 7–8. P. 1251–1268.Shahrestani S. Machine Learning in the Realm of Neurosurgery Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review // Neurosurgical Review. 2020. Vol. 43. No. 2. P. 543–552.Shahrestani S. Machine Learning in the Realm of Neurosurgery Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review // Neurosurgical Review. 2020. Vol. 43. No. 2. P. 543–552.Wild K. Status of Computerized Cognitive Testing in Aging: A Systematic Review // Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2008. Vol. 4. No. 6. P. 428–437.Wild K. Status of Computerized Cognitive Testing in Aging: A Systematic Review // Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2008. Vol. 4. No. 6. P. 428–437.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.