Socio-psychological problems in the life activities of students

The article analyses the quality of life of students and the importance of their life satisfaction. The quality of life of students, their life satisfaction and socio-psychological problems in their lives have been considered in the relationship with each other. And as a result of theoretical analysis the socio-psychological problems of students as determinants, factors, prerequisites of their quality of life, satisfaction with their life were established. Socio-psychological problems in the life of students were determined by the answers to the survey of 521 future specialists studying on psychological and pedagogical educational programs of Almaty, Astana, Semey, Ust-Kamenogorsk, Pavlodar cities in 2023–2024 academic year. Integration of socio-psychological problems obtained from the answers of the test subjects became known. One hundred and fourteen socio-psychological problems identified as a result of the analysis were identified and classified into 9 categories. The values of quantitative indicators in each category determined the magnitude, multidimensionality and multifactorial of socio-psychological problems in students' life activities. In addition, Pearson's correlation coefficient showed that the interdependence and interrelationship of socio-psychological problems in students' life are statistically significant. Identified at the level of the article socio-psychological problems in the life activities of students showed that improving the quality of their lives and levels of satisfaction with their own lives is a very complex and urgent problem in modern Kazakhstani society.

1. Karimi M., Brazier J. (2016). Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? // Pharmacoeconomics. Vol. 34. P. 645–649. (In English).

2. Moons P., Budts W., De Geest S. (2006) Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: a review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches // International journal of nursing studies. Vol. 43. No. 7. P. 891–901. (In English).

3. Whoqol Group et al. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization // Social science & medicine. 1995. Vol. 41. No. 10. P. 1403–1409. (In English).

4. Ermentaeva A.R. (2023) Beisubektılıktıñ psihologialyq prediktorlary // Eurasian Journal of Current Research in Psychology and Pedagogy. No. 3. P. 7-14. URL: https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-3999-2023-1-3-7-14. (In Kazakh)

5. Gabriele M. et al. (2016) Italian medical students quality of life: years 2005-2015 // Annali Di Igiene Medicina Preventiva e Di Comunita. Vol. 28. No. 4. P. 245–251. (In English).

6. Ghassab-Abdollahi N. et al. (2020) Association of quality of life with physical activity, depression, and demographic characteristics and its predictors among medical students // Journal of Education and Health Promotion. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 147. (In English).

7. Serinolli M.I., Novaretti M.C.Z. (2017) A cross-sectional study of sociodemographic factors and their influence on quality of life in medical students at Sao Paulo, Brazil // PLoS One. Vol. 12. No. 7. P. 0180009. (In English).

8. Shamionov R.M. (2008) Sub'ektivnoe blagopoluchie lichnosti: psihologicheskaja kartina i faktory. Saratov, 294 p. (In Russian).

9. Ermentaeva A.R. (2018) Bolaşaq mamandardyñ subektılık damu erekşelıkterı. Astana: JQS «İdeal İS 2009», 280 p. (In Kazakh).

10. Ermentaeva A.R. (2019) Subektılık damu psihologiasy. Nūr-Sūltan: JQS «İdeal İS 2009», 262 p. (In Kazakh).

11. Adilzhanova A., Turganbayeva B., Yermentayeva A., Aubakirova Z., Kulmysheva N., Oralbekova B. (2022). Specific features of the training seminar in order to improve the subjective well-being of students. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. No. 17(4), P. 1373–1384. URL: https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i4.7161. (In English).

12. Zinchenko V.P., Morgunov E.B. (1994) Chelovek razvivajushhijsja. Ocherki rossijskoj psihologii. M., 304 p. (In Russian).