Preview

Eurasian Journal of Current Research in Psychology and Pedagogy

Advanced search

Meta-message in the psycho-functional rebuilding method: neurobiological mechanisms and experience of use

https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-3999-2026-1-2-18-33

Abstract

This article considers the phenomenon of meta-messages as a central mechanism of the psychofunctional unblocking method (PF_R) and analyzes its putative neurobiological and psychophysiological foundations. The aim of the study was to determine the role of meta-messages in the activation of unconscious processes associated with the resolution of internal conflicts, emotional processing, and psychophysical regulation. The theoretical model of the method is based on modern concepts of mirror neurons, nonverbal communication mechanisms, trance states of consciousness, and the neurodynamics of emotional response. The study included 4,390 people aged 25 to 58 years, 88.6% of whom were women and 11.4% were men. After the PF_R sessions, the subjective and observed reactions of the participants were analyzed. Most of the subjects experienced trance and theta-dominant states of consciousness, as well as pronounced emotional, motor, and autonomic reactions. The effectiveness of the method was confirmed by a statistically significant improvement in the psychological state on the visual analogue scale: the average score increased from 4.8±2.3 to 8.8±1.3. These results demonstrate the high therapeutic value of meta-messages as a means of non-verbal influence and demonstrate the potential of the PF_R method in the treatment of chronic psychological trauma and emotional blocks.

About the Authors

A. V. Markov
Limited Liability Partnership Union of Psychotherapists and Psychologists of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan

Markov A.V.,  specialist,

Almaty.



E. V. Shevchenko
Limited Liability Partnership Union of Psychotherapists and Psychologists of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan

Shevchenko E.V.,PhD, specialist,

Almaty.



References

1. Iacoboni M. Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons // Annual Review of Psychology. 2009. Vol. 60. No. 1. P. 653–670. URL: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604

2. Hoffmann M. The neurobiology of human super-communication: insights for medicine and business // World Journal of Neuroscience. 2021. Vol. 11. P. 287–306. URL: https://doi.org/10.4236/wjns.2021.114021

3. Markov A.V., Shevchenko E.V. Application of the method of psycho-functional unlocking // Psychology. Historical and Critical Reviews and Modern Studies. 2023. Vol. 12. No. 2A. P. 40–46. URL: https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2023.60.52.006

4. Markov A. The Psycho-Functional Rebuilding Method (PF_R) [Patent]. 2024.

5. Alkhatib A.J. The Role of Mirror Neurons in Emotional Processing and Functionality // Role of Mirror Neuron Cells in Mimicking and Cognition. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2025. P. 1–26. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-1225-6_1

6. Ekman P., Friesen W.V. Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception // Psychiatry. 1969. Vol. 32. No. 1. P. 88–106. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1969.11023575

7. Calderon Martinez E. et al. Text messages as a tool to improve cardiovascular disease risk factors control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials // BMC Public Health. 2025. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 1284. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21818-0

8. Van der Kolk B. The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. New York. 2014. P. 14–211.

9. Damasio A.R. et al. Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions // Nature Neuroscience. 2000. Vol. 3. No. 10. P. 1049–1056. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/79871

10. Sun Y. et al. What Else Is Happening to the Mirror Neurons? A Bibliometric Analysis of Mirror Neuron Research Trends and Future Directions (1996–2024) // Brain and Behavior. 2025. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. e70486. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70486

11. Penagos-Corzo J.C. et al. Mirror neurons and empathy-related regions in psychopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis // Social Neuroscience. 2022. Vol. 17. No. 5. P. 462–479. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2022.2128868

12. Tofani M. et al. Effects of mirror neuron-based rehabilitation techniques in hand injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022. Vol. 19. No. 9. P. 5526. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095526

13. Cascella M. et al. Mirror neurons and pain: a scoping review of experimental, social, and clinical evidence // Healthcare. 2026. Vol. 14. No. 2. P. 280. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14020280

14. Plata-Bello J. et al. The mirror neuron system also rests // Brain Structure and Function. 2017. Vol. 222. No. 5. P. 2193–2202. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-016-1335-5

15. Ramachandran V.S. Mirror neurons and imitation learning as the driving force behind “the great leap forward” in human evolution. 2000. URL: https://www.edge.org/documents/Rama-2000.pdf

16. Meini C., Paternoster A. Mirror neurons as a conceptual mechanism? // Mind & Society. 2012. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 183–201. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-012-0106-0

17. Jensen M.P., Adachi T., Hakimian S. Brain oscillations, hypnosis, and hypnotizability // American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis. 2015. Vol. 57. No. 3. P. 230–253. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2014.976786

18. Spivey M.J. et al. Eye movements during comprehension of spoken descriptions // Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 2000. Vol. 22. URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7z34j8zw

19. Ekman P. Darwin, deception, and facial expression // Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2003. Vol. 1000. No. 1. P. 205–221. URL: https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1280.010

20. Nummenmaa L. et al. Bodily maps of emotions // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014. Vol. 111. No. 2. P. 646–651. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321664111

21. Critchley H.D., Harrison N.A. Visceral influences on brain and behavior // Neuron. 2013. Vol. 77. No. 4. P. 624–638. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.008

22. Pezzulo G., Barca L., Friston K.J. Active inference and cognitive-emotional interactions in the brain // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2015. Vol. 38. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x14001009

23. Koole S.L., Tschacher W. Synchrony in psychotherapy: a review and integrative framework // Frontiers in Psychology. 2016. Vol. 7. P. 862. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00862

24. Koch S.C. et al. Effects of dance movement therapy and dance on health-related psychological outcomes: a meta-analysis update // Frontiers in Psychology. 2019. Vol. 10. P. 1806. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01806


Review

For citations:


Markov A.V., Shevchenko E.V. Meta-message in the psycho-functional rebuilding method: neurobiological mechanisms and experience of use. Eurasian Journal of Current Research in Psychology and Pedagogy. 2026;(2):18-33. https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-3999-2026-1-2-18-33

Views: 653

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2959-3999 (Print)
ISSN 2959-4006 (Online)