Stigma and mental illness in Central Asian societies: theoretical perspectives and implications

This article examines the theoretical underpinnings of mental illness stigma within Central Asian societies, with particular focus on Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Drawing upon social identity theory, cultural psychology, and post-Soviet transition frameworks, we explore how historical legacies, cultural beliefs, and socioeconomic factors contribute to the stigmatization of mental health disorders in the region. The article argues that mental illness stigma in Central Asia operates across multiple levels – structural, social, and internalized—and is deeply embedded within collectivist cultural frameworks that emphasize family honor and community judgment. We propose a comprehensive theoretical model that integrates Soviet psychiatric legacies with traditional belief systems and contemporary socioeconomic pressures. This model provides a foundation for understanding stigma reduction interventions and clinical approaches that may prove effective in Central Asian contexts.

1. Corrigan P.W., Watson A.C. Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness // World Psychiatry. 2002, no. 1(1), pp. 16–20.

2. Abdullah T., Brown T.L. Mental illness stigma and ethnocultural beliefs, values, and norms: an integrative review // Clinical Psychology Review. 2011, no. 31(6), pp. 934–948.

3. Weine S., Bahromov M., Loue S., Owens L. Traditional practices and exposure to bodily fluids in Tajikistan // Central Asian Survey. 2017, no. 36(2), pp. 175–189.

4. Ruiz P., Bhugra D. Textbook of cultural psychiatry. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

5. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict // The social psychology of intergroup relations. 1979, pp. 33–47.

6. Juviler P.H. Freedom’s ordeal: The struggle for human rights and democracy in post-Soviet states. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998.

7. Schwartz S.H. Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values // Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. Sage Publications. 1994, pp. 85–119.

8. Werner C.A., Donahue C., Hohmann S. Negotiating Social Change in Kazakhstan: An Ethnography of Health Workshops // Central Asian Survey. 2017, no. 36(1), pp. 81–97.

9. Kleinman A. Rethinking psychiatry: From cultural category to personal experience. Free Press, 1988.

10. Hohmann S., Riva S., Vaissov M. Traditional medicine and healing practices in Post-Soviet Central Asia // Health, Culture and the Human Body. 2010, pp. 233–244).

11. Kuramysova K., Lund C., Skeen S., Alem A., Abdumalik J., Adebimpe Y., Thornicroft G. Mental health and the right to health in Post-Soviet countries // The Lancet Psychiatry. 2015, no. 2(11), pp. 956–957.

12. Lavretsky H. The Russian concept of schizophrenia: A review of the literature // Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1998, no. 24(4), pp. 537–557.

13. van Voren R. Political abuse of psychiatry – An historical overview // Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2010, no. 36(1), pp. 33–35.

14. Field M.G., Twigg J.L. Russia’s torn safety nets: Health and social welfare during the transition. Macmillan, 2000.

15. Hohmann S. National identity and mental health reform in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan. Anthropology of East Europe Review. 2010, no. 28(1), pp. 59–84.