ejcrEurasian Journal of Current Research in Psychology and PedagogyEurasian Journal of Current Research in Psychology and Pedagogy2959-39992959-4006Университет «Туран»10.46914/2959-3999-2023-1-4-75-82ejcr-198Research ArticleПедагогика и методика образованияPedagogy and methods of educationРоль сетевого сотрудничества в развитии педагогических инновацийThe role of network collaboration in the development of pedagogical innovationshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-8263СадыковА. А.SadykovA. A.

м.э.н., ст. преподаватель

г. Алматы

MSc in economics, senior lecturer

Almaty

sadykov.a@uib.kzУниверситет международного бизнеса им. К. СагадиеваКазахстанK. Sagadiev University of International BusinessKazakhstan202331032025047582Copyright © Садыков А.А., 20242024Садыков А.А.Sadykov A.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ejcrpp.turan-edu.kz/jour/article/view/198

В данной работе исследуется понятие сетевого взаимодействия, с акцентом на его особенности в образовательной сфере на региональном уровне. Цель исследования заключается в систематизации существующих подходов к трактовке термина «сетевое взаимодействие» в различных научных дисциплинах и выявлении его значимости в контексте образования. В работе используются теоретический анализ научных трудов и эмпирическое исследование примеров взаимодействия образовательных организаций различных уровней. Основное внимание уделяется анализу сетевого взаимодействия между школами и вузами, а также роли сетевых технологий, таких как дистанционное обучение, в развитии образовательной системы. Результаты исследования показывают, что сетевое взаимодействие способствует созданию инновационных образовательных программ и развитию системы образования в регионе. Практическая значимость работы заключается в предложении моделей сетевого взаимодействия, которые могут быть использованы для улучшения образовательных процессов и оптимизации использования ресурсов. Вклад работы в область знаний состоит в углубленном понимании сетевого взаимодействия и его потенциала для инновационного развития образования.

This paper explores the concept of network interaction, with a focus on its characteristics in the educational sphere at the regional level. The aim of the research is to systematize existing approaches to interpreting the term “network interaction” in various scientific disciplines and to identify its significance in the context of education. The study employs theoretical analysis of academic works and empirical research on examples of interaction between educational organizations of different levels. The main focus is on analyzing network interaction between schools and universities, as well as the role of network technologies, such as distance learning, in the development of the educational system. The research results show that network interaction contributes to the creation of innovative educational programs and the development of the education system in the region. The practical significance of the work lies in proposing models of network interaction that can be used to improve educational processes and optimize resource use. The contribution of the study to the field of knowledge is a deeper understanding of network interaction and its potential for the innovative development of education.

сетевое взаимодействиеобразованиеинновациирегиональное развитиедистанционное обучениесетевые технологииnetwork interactioneducationinnovationsregional developmentdistance learningnetwork technologiesReferencesОрлихина Н.Е. Развитие региональной системы сетевой организации дополнительного профессионального образования учителей: дис.дра пед наук. – М., 2006. – 346 с.Orlihina N.E. (2006) Razvitie regional'noj sistemy setevoj organizacii dopolnitel'nogo professional'nogo obrazovanija uchitelej: dis.dra ped nauk. M., 346 p. (In Russian).Webser J. Networks of Collaboration or Conflict? Electronic Data Interchange and Power in the Supply Chain // The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 1995. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 31–42.Webser J. (1995) Networks of Collaboration or Conflict? Electronic Data Interchange and Power in the Supply Chain // The Journ al of Strategic Information Systems. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 31–42. (In English).Dubois A. Why relationships do not fit into purchasing portfolio models – a comparison between the portfolio and industrial network approaches // European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 2002. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 35–42.Dubois A. (2002) Why relationships do not fit into purchasing portfolio models – a comparison between the portfolio and industrial network approaches // European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 35–42. (In English).Achrol R.S. Marketing in the network economy // Journal of Marketing. 1999. Vol. 63. Special Issue. P. 146–163.Achrol R.S. (1999) Marketing in the network economy // Journal of Marketing. Vol. 63. Special Issue. P. 146–163. (In English).Haggins R. The Success and Failure of Policy-Implanted Iner-Firm Network Initiatives: Motivations, Processes and Structure // Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 2000. No. 12. P. 111–135.Haggins R. (2000) The Success and Failure of Policy-Implanted Iner-Firm Network Initiatives: Motivations, Processes and Structure // Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. No. 12. P. 111–135. (In English).Бек М.А., Бек Н.Н., Бузулукова Е.В. и др. Методология исследования сетевых форм организации бизнеса: моногр. – М.: Изд.дом ВШЭ, 2014. – 446 с.Bek M.A., Bek N.N., Buzulukova E.V. i dr. (2014) Metodologija issledovanija setevyh form organizacii biznesa: monogr. M.: Izd.dom VShJe, 446 p. (In Russian).Moller K. Strategic business nets their type and management // Journal of Business Research. 2005. Vol. 58. No. 5. P. 1274–1284.Moller K. (2005) Strategic business nets their type and management // Journal of Business Research. Vol. 58. No. 5. P. 1274–1284. (In English).Kogut B. The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure // Strategic Management Journal. 2000. No. 21. P. 405–425.Kogut B. (2000) The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure // Strategic Management Journal. No. 21. P. 405–425. (In English).Adner R. Value creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generation // Strategic Management Journal. 2010. No. 31. P. 306–333.Adner R. (2010) Value creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generation // Strategic Management Journal. No. 31. P. 306–333. (In English).Lansit I.M. The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business School Press, 2004. 272 p.Lansit I.M. (2004) The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business School Press, 272 p. (In English).Moore J.F. The Death of competition: Teadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. N.Y.: Harper Business, 1996. 297 p.Moore J.F. (1996) The Death of competition: Teadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. N.Y.: Harper Business, 297 p. (In English).Hart D.A. Innovation Clusters: Key Concepts. 2000. URL: http://www.reading.ac.uk/LM/LM/fulltxt/0600.pdf (accessed: 18.04.2024)Hart D.A. (2000) Innovation Clusters: Key Concepts. URL: http://www.reading.ac.uk/LM/LM/fulltxt/0600.pdf (accessed: 18.04.2024). (In English).Moreno J.L. Sociometry and the science of man. Beacon House, 1956. 474 p.Moreno J.L. (1956) Sociometry and the science of man. Beacon House, 474 p. (In English).Bavelas A.A. Mathematical model for group structures // Human organization. 1948. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 16–30.Bavelas A.A. (1948) Mathematical model for group structures // Human organization. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 16–30. (In English).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.